ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the correlation analysis between the deep-superficial flow-density ratio (DSFR) and treatment response of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Methods:Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) with macular edema secondary to BRVO from December 2018 to December 2019 in the Department of Ophthalmology of Beijing Hospital were enrolled in this study. There were 29 males (29 eyes) and 19 females (19 eyes), with the mean age of 58.77±10.88 years. All eyes were treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizuma once a month for 3 months, and then treated as needed. According to the central retinal thickness (CRT) 12 months after treatment, the patients were divided into good response group (CRT≤250 μm) and refractory group (CRT> 250 μm). The flow density in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) of all subjects was measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. The flow density of DCP and SCP measured at 3 follow-up times was selected and DSFR was calculated. The DSFR was recorded by the Study for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) -grid and Nine-grid. The flow density of DCP, SCP and DSFR were compared between the two groups by paired t test. At 3 months post-treatment, the efficacy of DSFR in ME treatment response was evaluated according to area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting the response to ME treatment. Results:At 12 months after treatment, there were 27 eyes in good response group and 21 eyes in refractory group. There was no statistical significance in the flow density of DCP ( t=1.804, 1.064, 0.660) and SCP ( t=0.581, 0.641, 0.167) and DSFR ( t=0.393、-0.553、0.474) in all area of response group and refractory group using ETDRS-GRID recording method ( P>0.05). The SCP, DCP and DSFR of the most severe non-perfusion area were (27.10±5.70) %, (28.33±8.95) %, 1.35±0.54 and (27.54±6.70) %, (29.11±0.42) %, 1.01±0.40 in the response group and refractory group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the flow density of DCP and SCP between the two groups ( t=-0.237,-0.340; P>0.05). The difference of DSFR between two groups was statistically significant ( t=2.288, P=0.024). Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that DSFR in the most severe non-perfusion area was associated with ME response (odds ratio=0.212, 0.085; P=0.027, 0.024). The AUC was used to evaluate the efficacy of DSFR in ME treatment response, the results showed that the AUC was 0.800, P=0.001, Youden index was 1.348, sensitivity was 67.7%, and specificity was 86.7%. Conclusions:DSFR reduction is more common in BRVO secondary to ME patients. DSFR correlates with ME treatment response.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the short-term intraocular pressure changes of the affected eye after the implantation of dexamethasone vitreous implant (Ozurdex), and indirectly understand the tightness of the scleral perforation of the 22G implant device.Methods:This is a prospective cohort design clinical observational study. From January 2018 to January 2020, 90 eyes (90 patients) who underwent vitreous Ozurdex implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology of Beijing Hospital were included in the study. There were 52 males (52 eyes), and 38 females (38 eyes); they were 14-79 years old. Forty-three eyes (43 patients) had retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, 29 eyes (29 patients) had uveitis with or without macular edema, 18 eyes (18 patients) had diabetic macular edema. All eyes underwent standard scleral tunnel vitreous cavity implantation Ozurdex treatment. The intraocular pressure was measured with a non-contact pneumatic tonometer 10 min before implantation (baseline) and 10, 30 min and 2, 24 h after implantation. The difference were compared between the intraocular pressure at different time points after implantation and the baseline. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare intraocular pressure between baseline and different time points after implantation.Results:The average baseline intraocular pressure of the affected eye was 14.85 [interquartile range (IQR): 11.60, 17.63] mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The average intraocular pressure at 10, 30 and 2, 24 hours after implantation were 11.90 (IQR: 8.95, 16.30), 13.75 (IQR: 9.95, 16.80), 13.60 (IQR: 10.95, 17.20), and 14.65 (IQR: 12.20, 17.50) mmHg. Compared with the baseline intraocular pressure, the intraocular pressure decreased at 10 and 30 minutes after implantation, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.001, P=0.002); the intraocular pressure difference was not statistically significant at 2, 24 h after implantation ( P=0.140, 0.280). Conclusions:There is a statistically significant difference in intraocular pressure reduction compared with the baseline in 10 and 30 minutes after vitreous implantation of Ozurdex, and there is no statistically significant difference between 2, 24 hours. This suggests that the 22G scleral puncture port of the preinstalled implant device cannot be completely closed immediately, and short-term intraocular pressure monitoring after implantation should be appropriately strengthened.